<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="weebly" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" >

<channel><title><![CDATA[Parry Sound-Muskoka Green Party - Letters to the Editor]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.psmgreenparty.ca/letters-to-the-editor1.html]]></link><description><![CDATA[Letters to the Editor]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 07:44:18 -0800</pubDate><generator>Weebly</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Sensible strategies to meet energy demands]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.psmgreenparty.ca/2/post/2011/08/sensible-strategies-to-meet-energy-demands.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.psmgreenparty.ca/2/post/2011/08/sensible-strategies-to-meet-energy-demands.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 07:07:55 -0800</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psmgreenparty.ca/2/post/2011/08/sensible-strategies-to-meet-energy-demands.html</guid><description><![CDATA[Harnessing safe and affordable energy is necessary for today and for future generations. The issue of how our energy will be created to power our communities was raised in Ken Black&rsquo;s editorial in the June 24 edition of the Weekender.He raised many legitimate concerns and questions about the approach that the traditional parties are taking with energy; however, I was disappointed that the solution [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: justify; ">Harnessing safe and affordable energy is necessary for today and for future generations. The issue of how our energy will be created to power our communities was raised in Ken Black&rsquo;s editorial in the June 24 edition of the Weekender.<br /><br /><span></span>He raised many legitimate concerns and questions about the approach that the traditional parties are taking with energy; however, I was disappointed that the solutions being presented by the Green Party of Ontario (GPO) were not acknowledged. Therefore, I would like to share some practical and realistic steps forward to address our energy needs.<br />First and foremost, energy conservation needs to be prioritized. The GPO advocates for a realistic step forward with the reinstatement and expansion of the Home Energy Savings Programs to enable homeowners and businesses the ability to use their energy as efficiently as possible. I believe the additional upside is the direct link between this program and the creation of jobs in our local economy.<br /><br /><span></span>In regards to the Green Energy Act, the GPO believes it needs a major shift toward an inclusion of the local community. Citizens need to be part of the decision-making process, and need to be recipients of the financial benefits. Another source of energy comes from outside Ontario.<br />Last year, the amount of power created by Darlington Nuclear, could have been replaced by negotiating agreements to purchase inexpensive hydroelectricity from Quebec. Currently, Vermont is set to buy power from Quebec at six cents per kilowatt hour.<br /><br /><span></span>A final option that needs to be further utilized is combined heat and power systems. This system, which already exists in some buildings in Ontario, would capture waste heat from chimneys in large buildings and turn it into electrical energy.<br /><br /><span></span>I believe that these are sensible strategies to meet our energy demands that do not involve new nuclear or coal generation.<br />Hopefully, as Mr. Black had requested, this has provided some details on an alternate plan to that of the Liberal, PC or NDP government. At the same time, core to successful politics is community engagement. Let&rsquo;s keep the discussion going, without bias, and demand that the best solutions come forward.<br /><br /><span></span>Matt Richter, Parry Sound-Muskoka Candidate for Green Party of Ontario</div>  ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Missing components in the fluoride debate need answers]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.psmgreenparty.ca/2/post/2011/04/missing-components-in-the-fluoride-debate-need-answers.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.psmgreenparty.ca/2/post/2011/04/missing-components-in-the-fluoride-debate-need-answers.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psmgreenparty.ca/2/post/2011/04/missing-components-in-the-fluoride-debate-need-answers.html</guid><description><![CDATA[After re-reading the comments in last Friday's Weekender article on the fluoride debate, I felt that it was important to address some missing components in the report presented by the representatives of the Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit.&nbsp; I was disappointed the SMDHU did not cite the source of fluoride that is added to the District of Muskoka'd drinking water.&nbsp; Perhaps an oversight?Currently, the  [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; ">After re-reading the comments in last Friday's Weekender article on the fluoride debate, I felt that it was important to address some missing components in the report presented by the representatives of the Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit.&nbsp; I was disappointed the SMDHU did not cite the source of fluoride that is added to the District of Muskoka'd drinking water.&nbsp; Perhaps an oversight?<br /><br /><span>Currently, the fluoride that is added to the district drinking water </span>is trucked to Muskoka from a London, Ontario-based phosphate fertilizer plant.&nbsp; However, it has been claimed that this phosphate fertilizer byproduct is a toxic substance and should not be confused with naturally occurring calcium fluoride.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; I think it is crucial that the public be given a confirmation into this particular matter.&nbsp; <br /><br /><span>Meanwhile, other relevant questions have surfaced:&nbsp; How much money is the district paying for this substance? Is the public allowed to view the process of the fluoride being dumped into our drinking water? Why are tooth decay rates in Ontario relatively similar&nbsp; Quebec </span>(over 75 per cent of water is fluoridated in Ontario and under eight per cent in Quebec)? <br /><br /><span>If fluoride is to protect our teeth, why do we ingest it? We would never protect our skin from the sun by drinking sunscreen.</span><br /><br /><span>The cost is quite prohibitive for a homeowner to install a system to remove the fluoride from public drinking water.&nbsp; How does the district address the wishes of people who want the fluoride removed from their water? Why is it that almost every European country does not fluoridate? </span><br /><br /><span>Plenty of questions needing genuine responses.&nbsp; Let's keep the discussion going.</span><br /><br /><span>Matt Richter</span><br /><span>Provincial Green Party Candidate</span><br /><span>Parry Sound-Muskoka</span><br /></div>  ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Province's top-down leadership style must change]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.psmgreenparty.ca/2/post/2010/12/provinces-top-down-leadership-style-must-change.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.psmgreenparty.ca/2/post/2010/12/provinces-top-down-leadership-style-must-change.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 12:06:02 -0800</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psmgreenparty.ca/2/post/2010/12/provinces-top-down-leadership-style-must-change.html</guid><description><![CDATA[Amidst photo opportunities and spin  phrases our provincial budget  was presented last week to an increasingly  disengaged public. No  wonder, considering how rare any genuine sense of  empowerment has been  bestowed upon Ontario&rsquo;s residents to contribute  ideas and solutions.  How often did people attend public meetings or  forums under the  illusion that they were being listened to?     [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; ">Amidst photo opportunities and spin  phrases our provincial budget  was presented last week to an increasingly  disengaged public. No  wonder, considering how rare any genuine sense of  empowerment has been  bestowed upon Ontario&rsquo;s residents to contribute  ideas and solutions.  How often did people attend public meetings or  forums under the  illusion that they were being listened to?<br /></div>  <div >  <!--BLOG_SUMMARY_END--></div>  <div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; "><span>Consider the past year in our Parry Sound-Muskoka riding: health  care technicians, nurses and doctors expressed concerns about the  deficit reduction strategy; small to medium sized businesses stressed  that the amount of &ldquo;red tape&rdquo; jeopardizes their bottom line;  post-secondary students pleaded to have reduced tuition rates; local  farmers outlined the need for increased accessibility to local food  production facilities and abattoirs; health promotion professionals  demonstrated the hypocrisy of increasing the tax (HST) on activities and  services that actually prevent people from being sick; teachers  consistently explained how money from standardized testing and related  projects would be better spent on reduced class sizes and expanded  resources; towns and municipalities strived to bring their budgets in  check without having to resort to urban sprawl&hellip;<br /><span></span><br /><span></span>   The examples continue, and the budget failed to act upon the  feedback of the people. Angst and anger will only remain if the current  top-down management leadership style continues. Every budget issue  required the government to listen and act upon the experience and  guidance found at the grassroots level. By doing so, the public would  become entitled to the participatory democracy process and provide the  first step towards a platform that can rebuild a prosperous economy,  develop sustainable communities and restore the health and well-being of  Ontarians.<br /><span></span><br /><span></span>   Matt Richter<br /><span></span>   Parry Sound-Muskoka<br /><span></span>   Provincial Green Party Candidate<br /><span></span><br /><span></span></span></div>  ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Green Party slams province's long-term energy plan]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.psmgreenparty.ca/2/post/2010/12/green-party-slams-provinces-long-term-energy-plan.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.psmgreenparty.ca/2/post/2010/12/green-party-slams-provinces-long-term-energy-plan.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psmgreenparty.ca/2/post/2010/12/green-party-slams-provinces-long-term-energy-plan.html</guid><description><![CDATA[On Nov. 23 the Government of Ontario  released its updated Long-Term Energy Plan. The 20-year plan includes  closing all coal-fired plants by 2014, increasing power supply from  renewable sources to 13 per cent by 2018, expanding hydroelectric power  and relying on nuclear power for half of the province&rsquo;s power supply.&nbsp; Under the plan, the province pledges to bring more clean power  online and reduce the cost to consume [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; ">On Nov. 23 the Government of Ontario  released its updated Long-Term Energy Plan. The 20-year plan includes  closing all coal-fired plants by 2014, increasing power supply from  renewable sources to 13 per cent by 2018, expanding hydroelectric power  and relying on nuclear power for half of the province&rsquo;s power supply.&nbsp; Under the plan, the province pledges to bring more clean power  online and reduce the cost to consumers by encouraging conservation.</div>  <div >  <!--BLOG_SUMMARY_END--></div>  <div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; ">   But bringing on renewable energy does not come without a toll.  According to the plan, &ldquo;residential and small business electricity bills  are forecasted to increase by 3.5 per cent annually over the next 20  years.&rdquo;<br />   But, the previous week in their fall economic statement, the same  government predicted that electricity rates would rise by 46 per cent  over the next five years.<br />   The Long-Term Energy Plan reiterates the government&rsquo;s pledge to  take 10 per cent off monthly electricity bills for families, farms and  small businesses starting Jan. 1, 2011.<br />   As time-of-use billing rolls out across the province and Muskoka, a  move that critics predict will raise home hydro bills, the government  has backtracked on setting the off-peak period, changing it from 9 p.m.  to 7 p.m. This will increase the lower rate period by two hours a day. <br />   Green Party of Ontario leader Mike Schreiner called the plan shortsighted and fiscally irresponsible.&nbsp;&nbsp;   &ldquo;Both the Liberals and Conservatives are proposing the highest cost  and highest risk strategy to keep our lights on: investment in new  nuclear capacity,&rdquo; he said. &nbsp;<br /><br />   The Green Party recommends a priority on investment in conservation and energy efficiency.&nbsp;&nbsp;   &ldquo;Presenting a realistic strategy for the residents of Parry  Sound-Muskoka to use less electricity is a simple step forward to  addressing our energy problems,&rdquo; said provincial Green Party candidate  and Port Sydney resident Matt Richter.<br /><br />   Richter would like to see Ontario prioritize community power projects that are locally owned and locally planned.&nbsp;&nbsp;   &ldquo;Consider the controversy surrounding the Bala Falls project,&rdquo; he  said. &ldquo;And how different the scenario could have played out if the  entire community were part of the process.&nbsp; Either the project would  have been cancelled a long time ago, or with unanimous support, the  direct social and financial benefits would belong to the residents.&nbsp; To  quote a resident from the Danish island of Samsoe when speaking of a  locally owned windmill project, &ldquo;When the corporation owns the  windmills, windmills are ugly.&nbsp; When the people own the windmills,  windmills are beautiful.&rdquo;<br /><br /></div>  ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Burk's Falls Health Services ]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.psmgreenparty.ca/2/post/2010/07/first-post.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.psmgreenparty.ca/2/post/2010/07/first-post.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 18:20:15 -0800</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psmgreenparty.ca/2/post/2010/07/first-post.html</guid><description><![CDATA[To genuinely listen to the opinions, concerns and ideas of the public  and acknowledge their input by governing in accordance with them  reflects participatory democracy.&nbsp; The potential to empower the public  in the decision making process of all sectors of government is a key  component of what attracted me to Provincial politics.&nbsp; However, we  currently seem to be living in a dysfunctional system, in which our  residen [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; ">To genuinely listen to the opinions, concerns and ideas of the public  and acknowledge their input by governing in accordance with them  reflects participatory democracy.&nbsp; The potential to empower the public  in the decision making process of all sectors of government is a key  component of what attracted me to Provincial politics.&nbsp; However, we  currently seem to be living in a dysfunctional system, in which our  resident&rsquo;s voices are only being heard, and not listened to.&nbsp; This has  never been more apparent than today&rsquo;s conflict between the community of  Burk&rsquo;s Falls and Ontario&rsquo;s government.&nbsp; The people who live in Burk&rsquo;s  Falls have been told that an Urgent Care Clinic, Long-term beds, and  other services are not necessary for their town.&nbsp; Whereas, it is those  very people who have rallied together to clearly express that they are  extremely necessary. </div>  <div >  <!--BLOG_SUMMARY_END--></div>  <div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; "><link href="file:///C:%5CUsers%5CJames%5CAppData%5CLocal%5CTemp%5Cmsohtml1%5C01%5Cclip_filelist.xml">     Who is correct?  <br />There are scores of points that have affirmed Burk&rsquo;s Falls position (proximity to an essential service, impact of population growth, loss of potential business investment, and the list continues).&nbsp; However, the government relied on one determining factor: Money. And their quick fix, first step focused on eliminating services that Burk&rsquo;s Falls deserves to save $1.8 million to help Muskoka Algonquin Health Care (MAHC) out of their deficit. Burk&rsquo;s Falls has been used as the scapegoat to bailout a much larger problem, which is the Provincial Government&rsquo;s mismanagement of our tax dollars.<br /><br />Consider that in 2004, Burk&rsquo;s Falls&rsquo; health care services were included in the Ontario Health Care budget which stood at $29 billion.&nbsp; Today, the Ontario Health Care budget has increased to $42 billion, yet health care services in Burk&rsquo;s Falls have been decimated.&nbsp; Nearly a 50% increase in funding has resulted in a decrease of services.&nbsp; How is this possible?  <br /><br />I question the illogical choices and ineffective results that our Provincial government has recently made.&nbsp; Following are but a few examples: The disastrous spending of $1 billion on e-health; The contradictory provision of financial assistance to auto manufacturers in need, while slashing health care services; The unnecessary establishment of the Localized Health Integrated Network that pays staff well over $10 million to inform how cuts to health care can proceed; The ill-conceived introduction of an Ontario Health Premium (tax) that has evidently resulted in less health care; The bizarre notion to hike taxes (HST) on products that promote health (e.g. bicycles, vitamins).&nbsp; The list could truly continue in the format of an entire special section for this newspaper.&nbsp;   <br /><br />From an economic, environmental, and social point of view it simply makes sense to reinstate our health care services.&nbsp; If our riding&rsquo;s voice accepts the cuts to Burk&rsquo;s Falls, our complacency will reward the incompetence of how our Provincial Government handles our money, thereby leading the way to further inferior funding for health care in Huntsville, Bracebridge, Gravenhurst, Parry Sound, and all communities between.&nbsp; Hopefully, we recognize that our current problems are more a lack of management rather than a lack of tax dollars.&nbsp; Early in the New Year, the powers that be will return to present the MAHC deficit recovery plan.&nbsp;&nbsp; This will be your opportunity to get involved, share concerns and solutions, and show your support for communities like Burk&rsquo;s Falls.&nbsp;&nbsp;   <br /><br />Matt Richter<br />Parry Sound-Muskoka <br />Provincial Green Party Candidate<br /><br />  </div>  ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Don’t tax items that promote health]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.psmgreenparty.ca/2/post/2010/07/dont-tax-items-that-promote-health.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.psmgreenparty.ca/2/post/2010/07/dont-tax-items-that-promote-health.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psmgreenparty.ca/2/post/2010/07/dont-tax-items-that-promote-health.html</guid><description><![CDATA[Over a week has passed since I received the  official HST guide in  the mail, and during this time, not one resident  whom I spoke with  agrees with the decisions made to increase the tax on  items that  promote our health.&nbsp; House league soccer, camping at  Massassauga,  Killbear, or Killarney Provincial Park, and purchasing a  fishing  license will cost more.&nbsp; We are living in a time when inactivity  and  obesity are fr [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; ">Over a week has passed since I received the  official HST guide in  the mail, and during this time, not one resident  whom I spoke with  agrees with the decisions made to increase the tax on  items that  promote our health.&nbsp; House league soccer, camping at  Massassauga,  Killbear, or Killarney Provincial Park, and purchasing a  fishing  license will cost more.&nbsp; We are living in a time when inactivity  and  obesity are frighteningly on the rise, thus contributing to our  health  care costs spiraling out of control. </div>  <div >  <!--BLOG_SUMMARY_END--></div>  <div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; "><span>Preventing people from  acquiring illness or disease is an obvious worthwhile and noble goal for  any government.&nbsp; It promotes the well being of our residents and would  be the most effective long-term measure to eliminate the health care  deficit.&nbsp; As the rationale states: A penny invested today saves a dollar  tomorrow.&nbsp; We need incentives for our residents to be active, not tax  penalties. &nbsp;<br />I believe that anyone living in Ontario should be  rewarded by the government for choosing to do any of the following: Join  a sports league; enter an athletic event (i.e. triathlon); rent ice for  hockey; become a member of a gym; avoid colds by increasing their  vitamin C intake; spend a weekend camping; eat the healthy meat and fish  that hunting and fishing provides; buy a bicycle; and the list  continues.&nbsp; Instead, such activities and initiatives will be taxed more  heavily with the HST.<br />It is unfathomable that our government would  actually punish Ontarians for making pro-active, healthy choices. Yet,  that is exactly what the current provincial government has done. &nbsp;<br />The  Green Party of Ontario believes in supporting the health and well being  of Ontario citizens and would in fact, promote such services, not tax  them.<br />Matt Richter<br />Parry Sound-Muskoka<br />Provincial Green Party  Candidate                                      </span></div>  ]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>

